
Les Miserables by Victor Hugo is a sprawling masterpiece that delves into the themes of redemption, true love, human nature, and social inequalities in 19th century France. The novel follows the convict Jean Valjean on his quest for redemption against the backdrop of poverty and a harsh penal system. Through intricate storytelling and detailed descriptions, Hugo weaves together the lives of a diverse cast of characters, providing a rich tapestry of human experiences.
Genres:
Tropes/Plot Devices:
Topics:
Notes:
Sensitive Topics/Content Warnings
Triggers/content warnings include themes of poverty, death, crime, violence, and social injustice.
Has Romance?
There is a medium level of romance in the story, primarily focused on the relationship between Cosette and Marius.
From The Publisher:
Les Misérables is a magnificent, sweeping story of revolution, love and the will to survive set amidst the poverty stricken streets of nineteeth-century Paris.
Escaped convict Jean Valjean turns his back on his criminal past to build his fortunes as an honest man. He takes in abandoned orphan Cosette and raises her as his own daughter. But Jean Valjean is unable to free himself from his previous life and is pursued to the end by ruthless policeman Javert. As Cosette grows up, young idealist Marius catches a glimpse of her and falls desperately in love. The fates of all the characters await them during the violent turmoil of the June Rebellion in 1832.
This abridged version of Victor Hugo's masterpiece was published in 1915 with the aim to provide 'a unified story of the life and soul-struggles of Jean Valjean'.
Ratings (128)
Incredible (41) | |
Loved It (37) | |
Liked It (27) | |
It Was OK (16) | |
Did Not Like (6) | |
Hated It (1) |
Reader Stats (299):
Read It (136) | |
Currently Reading (3) | |
Want To Read (122) | |
Did Not Finish (6) | |
Not Interested (32) |
3 comment(s)
I have never struggled my way through a book as much as I did with this. Read the English translation (I'm not English) and I found the language and writing style hard at times but it was so worth it! It's so gritty and dark about struggles and poverty, yet it so beautiful. It's is truly a masterpiece and I'm so happy I've read it. But I'm also happy I'd seen the musical recently and not only did it spark a need to reread it but a better understanding of the story. The book obviously contains much more but it certainly helped!
This...this is a difficult book to review. I can't give it any stars because at different points in the book, I either really liked it or struggled to keep myself going with it.
Les Miserables is not a novel. Or, rather, it's not just a novel. It's a philosophy lesson, a history lesson, and a detail-oriented background in one. He goes off on tangents and sometimes, it was laborious to get through. (Something like 60 pages of background on Waterloo? WTF). I considered giving up three times. I forced myself to keep going.
I felt like there was a good story buried in there, beneath all of the crap, but it was difficult to get through. I read this book for the story and I feel like I would have been better served reading the abridged version or watching the PBS mini-series or the recent movie. This was more than just the story of Cosette, Jean Valjean, Javert, etc. This was a recounting of France in that era, of the prevailing philosophies and extensive background information, and it was the piece de la resistance of Hugo's life.
Les Miserables is a masterpiece...but.
I feel toward it the way I felt toward Wuthering Heights, the movie, when I saw it in class. "This is masterfully done...but it's not for me." You can appreciate something, call it art, and acknowledge that it is not intended for you or that while there are parts that you enjoy, the piece itself is not to your liking. And that is how I feel about Les Miserables.
I cried at the end of the book, even though it felt like Hugo basically took a machete to most of my favorite characters just to cut them down. So that was moving.
People told me not to give up on the book and that I would be glad I didn't. Am I glad I didn't? I don't know, to be perfectly honest. It fills in blanks for characterization for the PBS mini-series, of what I've seen so far. Would I have regretted not finishing it? Perhaps. Perhaps not. The only reason I ultimately stuck with it was that I had read so much of it already that I felt to abandon it would be to admit defeat.
Let me put it to you this way. I enjoyed the actual story. But a lot of it felt an awful lot like reading for school, where you have to force your way through. And that, to me, is not enjoyable.
Yes, the book has a lot of interesting philosophy, a lot of which is applicable today considering class divides and our current social problems. Looking at it from an academic point of view, I can see why teachers might have assigned this as required reading. It also had a lot of vocab that I've never seen before and I don't mean French excerpts. It's not often that I encounter that many words I've never read before.
Les Mis is not pleasure reading, not for me. As I said, there were pleasurable parts in it, but overall, this is not why I read fiction.
Odd as it is, I think another comparison might be drawn to a contemporary novel--The Hate U Give. That book is important to read given the political climate and I thought it was well done. I made my mother read it. Just because a book is important to read, however, does not necessarily make it an enjoyable book. And that is the case here, as well as with THUG.
I read this book in preparation for a YA sci fi book based off Les Mis. All I can say is: I sure as hell hope that book doesn't suck, because I'd be a little pissed off if I spent over twenty hours reading Les Mis for nothing.
This abridged edition was the one I first read in high school, completely unfamiliar with the musical or plot. For years I considered it my favorite book due to the impact it had on me: such powerful messages of grace, forgiveness, and redemption, especially contrasted against the strict black-and-white legalism that has always come more naturally to me.
I've since read
an unabridged version, which admittedly I didn't care for as much.
About the Author:
Victor Hugo (1802-1885) was the son of a high-ranking officer in Napoleon Bonaparte's Grand Army. A man of literature and politics, he participated in vast changes as France careened back and forth between empire and more democratic forms of government. As a young man in Paris, he became well-known and sometimes notorious for his poetry, fiction, and plays. In 1845, the year that he began writing his masterwork, Les Misérables, the king made him a peer of France, with a seat in the upper legislative body. There he advocated universal free education, general suffrage, and the abolition of capital punishment. When an uprising in 1848 ushered in a republic, he stopped writing Les Misérables and concentrated on politics. But in 1851, when the president proclaimed himself emperor, Hugo's opposition forced him into a long exile on the British Channel Islands. There, in 1860, he resumed work on Les Misérables, finishing it the next year. With the downfall of the emperor in 1870, Hugo returned to France, where he received a hero's welcome as a champion of democracy. At his death in 1885, two million people lined the streets of Paris as his coffin was borne to the Pantheon. There he was laid to rest with every honor the French nation could bestow.
When you click the Amazon link and make a purchase, we may receive a small commision, at no cost to you.